hack de Kelp et retraits massifs DeFi — Kelp hack and TVL impact
The report titled ‘hack de Kelp et retraits massifs DeFi’ describes a hack on Kelp that coincided with large withdrawals across decentralized finance. Within 48 hours, total value locked (TVL) for the affected protocols fell from 26.4 billion USD to 17.52 billion USD, representing a 33.63% decrease, and global DeFi TVL declined to 85.64 billion USD. Total withdrawals from all DeFi during the same period amounted to 14.08 billion USD.
Protocol-specific impacts and responses following the hack de Kelp et retraits massifs DeFi were recorded for major protocols and tokens. Aave held approximately 8.88 billion USD in TVL during the period reported, and the protocol closed the rsETH market on its app. On the Ethereum mainnet, rsETH is reported as fully covered, while rsETH positions on Aave V3 and V4 remain frozen with exposure capped. The provided facts record these specific market closures and freezes without additional operational detail.
WETH reserves are reported as frozen across several markets, including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle and Linea. During this period, Lido surpassed Aave to become the largest DeFi protocol by TVL. The account of frozen reserves and market closures pertains to the specific tokens and markets listed, with no further operational or remediation details disclosed. The status of rsETH differs between the Ethereum mainnet and Aave deployments as reported. These market freezes were reported for WETH specifically across the named markets.
The article notes a hack valued at 290 million USD on Kelp. It cites interdependence risks across decentralized finance protocols and names examples including Drift and Stream Finance. The piece presents these elements within its discussion of contagion and systemic risks in DeFi, listing them as factual items addressed in the coverage.
The article reports that 19 million records were offered for sale after a data leak at France Titres (ANTS). It further lists the hack, protocol interdependencies and the data leak as separate factual points related to systemic exposure in the sector. The facts in the article are presented without operational remediation details in the provided summary.
The article covered the Kelp hack and massive DeFi withdrawals and documented the incident’s immediate effects on decentralized finance markets. It reported large withdrawals and a marked decline in protocol liquidity, and described specific protocol reactions including market closures and asset freezes. The coverage highlighted concerns about contagion and systemic interdependence among DeFi protocols, and reported ancillary impacts such as a related data leak. The presentation remained factual and did not include operational remediation details.
